According to an article in the Columbia Flier, proponents for a plan to install speed cameras in Howard county like Ken Ulman and James Robey might just make it happen.
Speed cameras seem like a good idea right? Not in my opinion they don't. Why? Because speed cameras don't address the cause, they address the effect. If you're driving down Broken Land parkway and see a speed camera what are you going to do?
Slow down if your smart and when you pass, speed back up, right? So the speed cameras may in fact act as a deterrent when vehicles are within its field of view but as soon as they aren't they accelerate again.
Opponents in Annapolis disagree with the statement made by Ulman, linking the installation of speed cameras to public safety. They argue that its all about revenue. What do you think?
1 year ago
1 comment:
Speed camera's are a safety hazard. They installed a new set of them on 108 near Olney, I pass them every day, and every day I have to slam on my brakes to avoid hitting some idiot in front of me who comes to a crawl, only to speed back up once away from the camera.
Post a Comment